Arthur Madden's Reported Cases
United States v. Jackson, 506 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 2007)
Davidson v. United States, 213 Fed.Appx. 769 (11th Cir. 2007)
United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2006)
United States v. Irizarry, 458 F.3d 1208 (11th Cir. 2006)
United States v. Jockisch, 159 Fed.Appx. 145 (11th Cir. 2005)
United States v. Figaro, 126 Fed.Appx.
75 (3rd Cir. 2005)
Davidson v. United States,
213 Fed.Appx. 769 (11th Cir. 2005)
United States v. Davidson, 360 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 2004)
Horsley v. State, 45 F.3d 1486 (11th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Martin, 38 F.3d 534 (11th Cir. 1994)
United States v. Young, 39 F.3d 1561 (11th Cir. 1994)
United States v. Beasley, 2 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1993)
Richardson v. Johnson, 864 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir. 1989)
George v. White, 837 F.2d 1516 (11th Cir. 1988)
Gramegna v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 675 (11th Cir. 1988)
United States v. Blum, 753 F.2d 999 (11th Cir. 1985)
United States v. Thompson, 976 F.2d 1380 (11th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Pritchett, 908 F.2d 816 (11th Cir. 1990)
United States v. Gonzalez, 810 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir. 1987)
James v. Home Const. Co. of Mobile, 621 F.2d 727 (5th Cir. 1980)
Hart v. Pugh, 878, So.2d 1150 (Ala. 2003)
State v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 835 So.2d 234 (Ala.
2002)
Ex parte Mayberry, 675 So.2d 504 (Ala. 1996)
McAleer v. Durry, 593 So.2d 1021 (Ala. 1992)
Ex parte Howard, 562 So.2d 254 (Ala. 1990)
Chesser v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., 551 So.2d 1024 (Ala. 1989)
Palughi v. City of Mobile, 526 So.2d 1 (Ala. 1988)
Ex parte Richardson, 508 So.2d 295 (Ala. 1987)
Ex parte Williams, 510 So.2d 135 (Ala. 1987)
Ex parte Stevens, 499 So.2d 795 (Ala. 1986)
Ex parte Edwards, 480 So.2d 1264 (Ala. 1985)
Ziegler v. State, 886 So.2d 127 (Ala.Crim.App. 2003)
State v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 835 So.2d 230 (Ala.Crim.App.
2000)
Barnes v. State, 704 So.2d 487 (Ala.Crim.App. 1997)
Barnes v. State, 727 So.2d 839 (Ala.Crim.App. 1997)
Horsley v. State, 675 So.2d 908 (Ala.Crim.App. 1996)
Tomlin v. State, 695 So.2d 157 (Ala.Crim.App. 1996)
Mayberry v. State, 675 So.2d 502 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995)
Reese v. State, 677 So.2d 1239 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995)
Harrison v. State, 651 So.2d 1134 (Ala.Crim.App. 1994)
Parnell v. State, 645 So.2d 309 (Ala.Crim.App. 1994)
Parnell v. State, 645 So.2d 308 (Ala.Crim.App. 1994)
Chatom v. State, 619 So.2d 222 (Ala.Crim.App. 1993)
M.E.C. v. State, 611 So.2d 1201 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992)
Ellis v. State, 591 So.2d 574 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991)
Bettis v. State, 534 So.2d 1135 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988)
Herriman v. State, 504 So.2d 353 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987)
Pate v. State, 512 So.2d 138 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987)
Richardson v. State, 508 So.2d 289 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987)
Ruffin v. State, 513 So.2d 63 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987)
Stevens v. State, 506 So.2d 373 (Ala.Crim.App. 1986)
Stevens v. State, 499 So.2d 801 (Ala.Crim.App. 1986)
Edwards v. State, 480 So.2d 1259 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985)
Stevens v. State, 499 So.2d 792 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985)
Bowden v. State, 610 So.2d 1256 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992)
T.P.H. v. State, 575 So.2d 1245 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991)
Wright v. State, 593 So.2d 111 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991)
Williams v. State, 510 So.2d 137 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987)
Hayes v. State, 443 So.2d 1323 (Ala.Crim.App. 1983)
Clayton v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County, 552 So.2d 145 (Ala.Civ.App.
1988)
Goolsby v. Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, 689 So.2d 104 (Ala.Civ.App.
1996)
Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Pinkney, 628 So.2d 767 (Ala.Civ.App.
1993)
James v. James, 532 So.2d 1031 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988)
Maxie Carroll Seafood v. Howard, 521 So.2d 1342 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988)
Nix v. State, 512 So.2d 121 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987)
Bock v. Bock, 621 So.2d 1345 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993)
Moffett v. Moffett, 570 So.2d 691 (Ala.Civ.App. 1990)
NOTE:
Madden has a tremendous reputation in the appellate arena, most recently arguing before the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Irizarry. State v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co involved a case of major impression for the criminal defense community as it sought to make a corporate entity criminally liable. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, along with its national director of litigation, claims representatives, and local counsel were indicted on state perjury charges. Charges against the corporation were dismissed.